<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Terraform on cloudplz</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/tags/terraform/</link><description>Recent content in Terraform on cloudplz</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cloudplz.cc/tags/terraform/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>No-Code Infrastructure Platform</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/no-code-infrastructure-platform/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/no-code-infrastructure-platform/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The bottleneck in database infrastructure was never the databases — it was the&#10;queue in front of them. This platform removed the queue: product teams&#10;provision production-ready Aurora clusters through a web form, no Terraform&#10;required.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="challenge"&gt;Challenge&#10;&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Infrastructure as code made provisioning repeatable, but it traded one&#10;bottleneck for another:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ul&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Terraform expertise required.&lt;/strong&gt; Not every team has it, and shouldn&amp;rsquo;t need it to get a database.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lead times.&lt;/strong&gt; A routine cluster request waited on the platform team&amp;rsquo;s queue.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Inconsistent patterns.&lt;/strong&gt; Left to hand-write HCL, teams produced infrastructure that drifted in quality and shape.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The platform team as critical path.&lt;/strong&gt; Every database request flowed through a small group — that doesn&amp;rsquo;t scale.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ul&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The goal: democratize provisioning without democratizing misconfiguration.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Aurora Migration Toolkit</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/aurora-migration-toolkit/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/aurora-migration-toolkit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Migrating a single database to Aurora is a project. Migrating fifty —&#10;including multi-terabyte, tier-0 systems with 24/7 write traffic — is a&#10;platform. This is the toolkit and methodology that made it repeatable.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="challenge"&gt;Challenge&#10;&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Each team&amp;rsquo;s database had different constraints: replication lag budgets,&#10;change-freeze windows, version skew between on-premises MySQL and Aurora,&#10;and applications that had grown assumptions about their database over a&#10;decade. One-off migration plans did not scale to fifty of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Terraform Module Library</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/terraform-module-library/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/terraform-module-library/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Self-service infrastructure only works if the self-service path is the&#10;easiest path. This module library made the compliant, production-hardened&#10;way to provision AWS infrastructure also the fastest one.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="challenge"&gt;Challenge&#10;&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Seventy application repositories, each capable of provisioning its own&#10;infrastructure. Without a shared library, every team reinvents VPC&#10;wiring, database parameter tuning, and IAM boundaries — and every&#10;reinvention is a future incident and an audit finding.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Migrating 50 Production Databases to Aurora with Under 3 Minutes of Downtime</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/writing/database-migration-at-scale/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/writing/database-migration-at-scale/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over about two years, we migrated around 50 production databases from on-premises MySQL to AWS Aurora. The largest were multi-terabyte, tier-0 systems with 24/7 write traffic. Most cutovers took under 3 minutes of downtime.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;That number is not the result of careful clicking during a maintenance window. It&amp;rsquo;s the result of treating the downtime budget as a &lt;strong&gt;design input&lt;/strong&gt;: once &amp;ldquo;3 minutes&amp;rdquo; is a requirement rather than a hope, every downstream decision — replication topology, rehearsal gates, connection draining, DNS weights — is forced into a specific shape. This post is the methodology that fell out of that constraint, plus what actually bit us along the way.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>20+ AWS Services in One terraform apply — Built for the New Free Plan</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/writing/terraform-aws-free-tier/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/writing/terraform-aws-free-tier/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;AWS&amp;rsquo;s new free plan comes with $200 in credits ($100 base + $100 bonus) — but only if you activate each activity individually. Most people don&amp;rsquo;t. I almost didn&amp;rsquo;t.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The first time I spun up an ElastiCache cluster for a personal project, I picked &lt;code&gt;cache.t4g.micro&lt;/code&gt; — the Graviton node type, which seemed like the obvious modern choice. The legacy free tier only ever covered &lt;code&gt;cache.t3.micro&lt;/code&gt;, and under the new Free Plan neither node type gets a free allowance — both burn credits. By the time I caught it, I&amp;rsquo;d burned a few days of charges on a cache I wasn&amp;rsquo;t even actively using. That&amp;rsquo;s the kind of mistake this module is designed to prevent.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>