<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>cloudplz</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/</link><description>Recent content on cloudplz</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cloudplz.cc/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>No-Code Infrastructure Platform</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/no-code-infrastructure-platform/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/no-code-infrastructure-platform/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The bottleneck in database infrastructure was never the databases — it was the&#10;queue in front of them. This platform removed the queue: product teams&#10;provision production-ready Aurora clusters through a web form, no Terraform&#10;required.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="challenge"&gt;Challenge&#10;&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Infrastructure as code made provisioning repeatable, but it traded one&#10;bottleneck for another:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ul&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Terraform expertise required.&lt;/strong&gt; Not every team has it, and shouldn&amp;rsquo;t need it to get a database.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lead times.&lt;/strong&gt; A routine cluster request waited on the platform team&amp;rsquo;s queue.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Inconsistent patterns.&lt;/strong&gt; Left to hand-write HCL, teams produced infrastructure that drifted in quality and shape.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The platform team as critical path.&lt;/strong&gt; Every database request flowed through a small group — that doesn&amp;rsquo;t scale.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ul&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The goal: democratize provisioning without democratizing misconfiguration.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Aurora Migration Toolkit</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/aurora-migration-toolkit/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/aurora-migration-toolkit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Migrating a single database to Aurora is a project. Migrating fifty —&#10;including multi-terabyte, tier-0 systems with 24/7 write traffic — is a&#10;platform. This is the toolkit and methodology that made it repeatable.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="challenge"&gt;Challenge&#10;&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Each team&amp;rsquo;s database had different constraints: replication lag budgets,&#10;change-freeze windows, version skew between on-premises MySQL and Aurora,&#10;and applications that had grown assumptions about their database over a&#10;decade. One-off migration plans did not scale to fifty of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Terraform Module Library</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/terraform-module-library/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/terraform-module-library/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Self-service infrastructure only works if the self-service path is the&#10;easiest path. This module library made the compliant, production-hardened&#10;way to provision AWS infrastructure also the fastest one.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="challenge"&gt;Challenge&#10;&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Seventy application repositories, each capable of provisioning its own&#10;infrastructure. Without a shared library, every team reinvents VPC&#10;wiring, database parameter tuning, and IAM boundaries — and every&#10;reinvention is a future incident and an audit finding.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vitess Production Deployment</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/vitess-production-deployment/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/vitess-production-deployment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Running Vitess in production for three years teaches you where horizontal&#10;scaling actually bites: ops discipline, not demos. This is the record of&#10;what it took to run the system that powers YouTube&amp;rsquo;s MySQL fleet, at a&#10;scale far smaller than YouTube&amp;rsquo;s — and why that changes the calculus.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="challenge"&gt;Challenge&#10;&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;A MySQL deployment outgrowing vertical scale: write volume and working&#10;set exceeding what a single well-tuned instance could absorb, with&#10;availability requirements that ruled out naive primary failover.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Canary Applications</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/database-canary-applications/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/projects/database-canary-applications/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When a platform team changes a Terraform module, bumps an engine version, or&#10;upgrades a connection library, the blast radius is every application built on&#10;top. Canary applications turn that blast radius into a tripwire.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="challenge"&gt;Challenge&#10;&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Platform-level changes fail in ways unit tests don&amp;rsquo;t catch: a parameter group&#10;default that breaks connection pooling, a provider upgrade that drifts state,&#10;an engine version with different driver behavior. The first signal used to be&#10;a product team&amp;rsquo;s pager.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Migrating 50 Production Databases to Aurora with Under 3 Minutes of Downtime</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/writing/database-migration-at-scale/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/writing/database-migration-at-scale/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over about two years, we migrated around 50 production databases from on-premises MySQL to AWS Aurora. The largest were multi-terabyte, tier-0 systems with 24/7 write traffic. Most cutovers took under 3 minutes of downtime.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;That number is not the result of careful clicking during a maintenance window. It&amp;rsquo;s the result of treating the downtime budget as a &lt;strong&gt;design input&lt;/strong&gt;: once &amp;ldquo;3 minutes&amp;rdquo; is a requirement rather than a hope, every downstream decision — replication topology, rehearsal gates, connection draining, DNS weights — is forced into a specific shape. This post is the methodology that fell out of that constraint, plus what actually bit us along the way.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Treating AI Agents Like Infrastructure: Provisioning Hermes Agent with Ansible</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/writing/provisioning-ai-agents-with-ansible/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/writing/provisioning-ai-agents-with-ansible/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve spent 18 years making cloud infrastructure reproducible. Terraform modules for databases. Ansible roles for VM configuration. Packer templates for golden images. When I started running an AI agent on a Linux VM, I didn&amp;rsquo;t think about it — I reached for Ansible.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Three days and 15 commits later, I had a fully idempotent playbook that provisions &lt;a href="https://hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/"&gt;Hermes Agent&lt;/a&gt; from bare Ubuntu to production-ready. And the patterns I used? They&amp;rsquo;re the same ones I use for databases and caching clusters. That&amp;rsquo;s not a coincidence — it&amp;rsquo;s the point.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>20+ AWS Services in One terraform apply — Built for the New Free Plan</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/writing/terraform-aws-free-tier/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/writing/terraform-aws-free-tier/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;AWS&amp;rsquo;s new free plan comes with $200 in credits ($100 base + $100 bonus) — but only if you activate each activity individually. Most people don&amp;rsquo;t. I almost didn&amp;rsquo;t.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The first time I spun up an ElastiCache cluster for a personal project, I picked &lt;code&gt;cache.t4g.micro&lt;/code&gt; — the Graviton node type, which seemed like the obvious modern choice. The legacy free tier only ever covered &lt;code&gt;cache.t3.micro&lt;/code&gt;, and under the new Free Plan neither node type gets a free allowance — both burn credits. By the time I caught it, I&amp;rsquo;d burned a few days of charges on a cache I wasn&amp;rsquo;t even actively using. That&amp;rsquo;s the kind of mistake this module is designed to prevent.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vitess vs Aurora: Making the Right MySQL Scaling Decision</title><link>https://cloudplz.cc/writing/vitess-vs-aurora-mysql-scaling/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cloudplz.cc/writing/vitess-vs-aurora-mysql-scaling/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;ve outgrown single-instance MySQL, you&amp;rsquo;re facing an uncomfortable choice: build custom sharding logic into your application, migrate to a different database system, or adopt a clustering solution like Vitess.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s the short version, so you know whether to keep reading: &lt;strong&gt;after running Vitess in production for 3 years, we migrated off it — to Aurora.&lt;/strong&gt; Not because Vitess failed us, but because the one capability that justified its operational cost (horizontal write sharding) turned out to be a capability we never actually needed. If your write traffic genuinely exceeds what one large primary can take — think tens of thousands of writes per second sustained, not bursts — Vitess is likely your answer and this post will tell you what operating it really costs. If you&amp;rsquo;re below that bar, Aurora is almost certainly the better decision, and this post will tell you why.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>